Enterprise Architecture (EA) has long promised to connect strategy, capability, process, and technology into a coherent view of how an organization operates. Done well, it provides clarity on where the enterprise invests, how value flows, and how structures support strategic goals. Yet despite its influence, most architecture models remain incomplete. They show what capabilities and systems exist, but not what the work inside them is for. Without understanding the focus of that work, what each activity is oriented toward, the architecture lacks operational depth.
Why Focus Matters
Not all work serves the same purpose. Some activities drive external outcomes by shaping products, services, and customer experience. Others are internal, directed toward efficiency and coordination. A third group is support-oriented, enabling other work but not producing direct outputs. When these distinctions are missing, architecture diagrams flatten reality. They show capabilities, processes, and technologies as connected boxes, but not whether those boxes produce customer value, internal performance, or infrastructure stability. Without this context, leaders cannot tell whether the organization is focusing its resources where they matter most.
Focus provides that missing clarity. By classifying every activity as external, internal, or support, leaders can see the composition of work within any capability, process, or structure. It exposes, for example, whether a capability labeled “Customer Experience” truly drives external value, or whether it is dominated by internal coordination work. It also reveals where support activities have expanded beyond what strategy requires, diluting overall focus and impact.
Connecting Focus to Enterprise Architecture
EA frameworks emphasize alignment between strategy and operations. But alignment cannot be verified without knowing the focus of the underlying work. A capability map may highlight “Customer Engagement” as a strategic priority, yet if the jobs that support it are filled with internal or support activities, that alignment exists only on paper. By introducing focus as a data layer, Orgsure transforms architecture from design intent into operational evidence. When applied across activities, focus shows whether the organization’s real work orientation matches its strategic emphasis. If a growth strategy depends on market engagement, focus analysis reveals whether enough work across relevant capabilities is externally directed or whether most activity remains internally absorbed. In this way, focus gives EA a diagnostic dimension. It bridges the gap between the structure that leaders design and the work that employees perform.
How Orgsure Makes Focus Measurable
Orgsure brings precision to enterprise architecture by measuring focus at the activity level, classifying every activity as external, internal, or support. Because activities are the foundation of jobs, and jobs roll up into structures and capabilities, Orgsure can aggregate focus data to any level of analysis, including functions, processes, capabilities, or the entire enterprise. A key benefit of this approach is that a single capability can contain activities with different focus values, enabling a level of investigation that most organizations have never been able to achieve. For example, within a capability like “Customer Analytics,” Orgsure may show that half the activities are externally focused on customer insight, while the other half are internally focused on data management and governance. This reveals how balanced or imbalanced the capability truly is in practice. Focus data also integrates with Orgsure’s other measures of capability, cost, value, and strategy type, providing a unified view of how work orientation supports or detracts from strategic priorities.
The Core Insight
Enterprise architecture succeeds only when it connects intent to reality. Focus provides the missing evidence by showing what type of work each part of the organization performs. By capturing focus at the activity level, Orgsure allows capabilities, processes, and structures to be analyzed with new precision. It transforms architecture from an abstract model into a measurable system of work, helping leaders see not just how the enterprise is designed, but whether its effort and investment are truly oriented toward customers, performance, or support, and whether that balance reflects the strategy it is meant to serve.
Suscipit nibh nunc eu mauris platea
Un horaire flexible signifie bien plus qu’un simple aménagement : il incarne une nouvelle manière de concevoir le temps de travail. Ces dernières années ont vu l’adoption croissante de concepts novateurs tels que les horaires flexibles, aussi appelés flexitime.
